Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Trump Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 28.5 | 100% |
| 1H O/U 18.5 | 100% |
| 1H O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| 1H O/U 27.5 | 100% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 100% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 3.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 6.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 12.5 | 100% |
| 1Q O/U 15.5 | 100% |
| 2Q O/U 7.5 | 100% |
| 2Q O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 12.5 | 100% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 14.5 | 100% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 16.5 | 100% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| 1Q Moneyline | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 100% |
| O/U 38.5 | 98% |
| O/U 44.5 | 92% |
| 1H O/U 24.5 | 91% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 19.5 | 91% |
| O/U 48.5 | 84% |
| Stanford O/U 19.5 | 80% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford | 79% |
| O/U 36.5 | 77% |
| Spread -2.5 | 76% |
| O/U 40.5 | 76% |
| O/U 42.5 | 76% |
| O/U 46.5 | 75% |
| O/U 50.5 | 74% |
| O/U 54.5 | 72% |
| Spread -1.5 | 70% |
| O/U 52.5 | 67% |
| Spread -3.5 | 61% |
| Spread -4.5 | 60% |
| Spread -5.5 | 57% |
| O/U 56.5 | 56% |
| Spread -6.5 | 55% |
| 4Q Moneyline | 55% |
| Spread -20.5 | 54% |
| O/U 58.5 | 52% |
| O/U 30.5 | 51% |
| O/U 32.5 | 51% |
| O/U 34.5 | 51% |
| Spread -24.5 | 50% |
| Spread -21.5 | 50% |
| Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| Spread -12.5 | 50% |
| Spread -16.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 30.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 18.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 27.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 30.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 3.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 22.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 25.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 28.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 31.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 22.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 25.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 28.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 2H Moneyline | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 3.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| 1H Moneyline | 50% |
| 2Q Moneyline | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 50% |
| Game Goes to Overtime | 50% |
| Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 50% |
| Pick-Six Scored | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 4.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| O/U 60.5 | 48% |
| Spread -8.5 | 46% |
| 3Q Moneyline | 45% |
| Spread -9.5 | 43% |
| Spread -10.5 | 41% |
| Spread -7.5 | 41% |
| Spread -12.5 | 40% |
| O/U 64.5 | 39% |
| Spread -4.5 | 37% |
| O/U 62.5 | 37% |
| Spread -3.5 | 35% |
| O/U 66.5 | 34% |
| Spread -18.5 | 32% |
| Spread -17.5 | 32% |
| Spread -11.5 | 32% |
| Spread -14.5 | 22% |
| O/U 68.5 | 22% |
| Spread -1.5 | 18% |
| Spread -2.5 | 17% |
| Spread -9.5 | 14% |
| Spread -6.5 | 11% |
| Spread -13.5 | 10% |
| Spread -10.5 | 8% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 0% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 0% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 0% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 0% |
Market context
Based on real-money crowd forecasting, georgia tech vs. stanford stands at 100% likelihood according to current market consensus. In the upcoming college football game between Georgia Tech and Stanford, scheduled for September 26 at 10:30PM ET: This market will resolve to "Georgia Tech" if Georgia Tech win th…
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $613K.
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for Georgia Tech vs. Stanford plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.
UK Frequently Asked Questions
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Trump Prediction route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- Are political prediction markets legal in my country?
- It varies. They sit in legal gray areas in most jurisdictions. Polymarket is geo-blocked from US/UK/EU; some broker frontends have a different geo footprint. Trade only with capital you can afford to lose, and only if you understand the legal status in your jurisdiction.
- Why do Polymarket and Kalshi differ on elections?
- Kalshi must follow CFTC compliance — strict definitions, clear resolution sources, US citizens only with KYC. Polymarket operates globally without CFTC oversight — deeper liquidity, but also higher regulatory risk.
- Are UK election prediction markets available from the UK?
- Yes. Betfair Exchange and Smarkets offer UKGC-regulated UK election markets (seat counts, party share, constituency results). Polymarket also lists UK election contracts with deeper global liquidity. Betfair winnings are typically tax-free for UK individuals; Polymarket profits are subject to HMRC CGT.
%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%206%2066%20A%2026%2026%200%200%201%2058%2066%22%20fill%3D%22%23E6B98D%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D%2232%22%20cy%3D%2226%22%20r%3D%2222%22%20fill%3D%22%23F5CBA7%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%2210%22%20y%3D%224%22%20width%3D%2244%22%20height%3D%2214%22%20rx%3D%227%22%20fill%3D%22%23fbbf24%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%228%22%20%20y%3D%2218%22%20width%3D%228%22%20%20height%3D%2218%22%20rx%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22%23fbbf24%22%20opacity%3D%220.7%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%2248%22%20y%3D%2218%22%20width%3D%228%22%20%20height%3D%2218%22%20rx%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22%23fbbf24%22%20opacity%3D%220.7%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
and%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%206%2066%20A%2026%2026%200%200%201%2058%2066%22%20fill%3D%22%23E6B98D%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D%2232%22%20cy%3D%2226%22%20r%3D%2222%22%20fill%3D%22%23F5CBA7%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%2010%2018%20Q%2016%204%2026%2010%20Q%2020%202%2032%206%20Q%2044%202%2038%2010%20Q%2048%204%2054%2018%22%20stroke%3D%22%23fbbf24%22%20stroke-width%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22none%22%20stroke-linecap%3D%22round%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
Trade Georgia Tech vs. Stanford on Trump Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →