Counter-Strike: ex-Zero Tenacity vs SAW (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #3 Group C

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

ex-Zero Tenacity and SAW were scheduled to meet in a best-of-three in CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #3 Group C, but the market is already pinned at 0% YES, which usually means the match has either been fully resolved elsewhere or traders are treating the ex-Zero Tenacity side as effectively out of contention. GosuGamers lists SAW as winning the series 2-0, while Sofascore shows the match started on 22 May at 14:00 UTC, so the practical question for settlement is whether the completed result is recognised cleanly inside the market’s window rather than whether the teams were in position to play. In that sense, the current price is less a live handicap than a reflection of a finished bracket outcome.

For comparison, markets on lower-tier CS2 qualifiers often move sharply only when the bracket is confirmed, because schedule changes, forfeits and delayed map results can all affect settlement. Here, the key catalyst is not form but the event record: whether CCT’s official bracket, a scoreboard feed such as Sofascore, or match reporting on GosuGamers confirms SAW’s 2-0 win before the 20:00 UTC settlement deadline. If the series had been postponed, abandoned or left without an official winner, the market could still have faced a 50-50 outcome under its rules; the available listings, however, point to a completed SAW victory, which leaves little room for uncertainty unless the underlying result is disputed or annulled.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for Counter-Strike: ex-Zero Tenacity vs SAW (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #3 Group C plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.

Resolution & payout

Political markets typically settle on official candidate or agency confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window opens, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD via CFTC clearinghouse, with clearly defined resolution sources (e.g. AP race calls for elections). Betfair settles after the official outcome is registered with the league or agency. Manifold is play-money.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.