Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Felix Gill vs Kyrian Jacquet

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Felix Gill and Kyrian Jacquet are due to meet in Roland Garros qualifying, with the market effectively pricing a completed match and a named winner. The crowd-implied probability sits at 100% YES, which suggests traders are treating the fixture as routine rather than a genuine cancellation or postponement risk. With the match listed as a qualification final on the ATP/WTA live listings and score services carrying the pairing, the base case is that play either happens on schedule or is quickly rescheduled within the settlement window.

For context, tennis match markets tend to trade close to certainty only when the event is firmly on the schedule and there is no active injury or withdrawal signal. The main historical analogue is not form, but logistics: qualifying matches at Grand Slams are usually resolved within a narrow time band unless weather, court scheduling, or a late withdrawal intervenes. In that sense, the 100% reading is less a verdict on who wins than a sign that the market sees almost no path to a 50-50 settlement.

The key catalyst is whether Roland Garros qualifying proceeds cleanly and whether either player gives a pre-match withdrawal or retirement indication. Flashscore and SofaScore both list the match and are the quickest places to catch a change in status, while ATP head-to-head pages confirm the pairing is a live tour-level event. If the start time shifts materially or one player is scratched, that would matter more to settlement than any pre-match price move; otherwise, traders are simply leaning on the scheduled order of play and the absence of cancellation risk.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Felix Gill vs Kyrian Jacquet plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.

Resolution & payout

For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.