Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Trump Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
94% | 6% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
94% | 6% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 94% |
| Spain O/U 0.5 | 86% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 79% |
| O/U 1.5 | 77% |
| Team to Advance | 75% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 71% |
| Spain 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 66% |
| Belgium O/U 0.5 | 59% |
| Spain O/U 1.5 | 56% |
| Spain 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 56% |
| O/U 2.5 | 52% |
| Both Teams to Score | 52% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 47% |
| Belgium 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 42% |
| Spain (-1.5) | 35% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 34% |
| Belgium 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 31% |
| O/U 3.5 | 30% |
| Spain O/U 2.5 | 28% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 28% |
| Spain 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 28% |
| Will the Match Go to Extra Time? | 25% |
| Belgium O/U 1.5 | 23% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 21% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 21% |
| Spain 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 20% |
| Will the Match Go to a Penalty Shootout? | 19% |
| Spain (-2.5) | 17% |
| O/U 4.5 | 14% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 12% |
| Belgium 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 10% |
| O/U 5.5 | 7% |
| Belgium 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 7% |
| Spain (-3.5) | 6% |
| Spain (-4.5) | 6% |
| Belgium O/U 2.5 | 6% |
| Belgium (-1.5) | 5% |
| O/U 6.5 | 2% |
| Belgium (-2.5) | 1% |
| Belgium (-3.5) | 1% |
| Spain (-5.5) | 1% |
| Belgium (-5.5) | 1% |
| O/U 7.5 | 1% |
| O/U 8.5 | 1% |
| Belgium (-4.5) | 0% |
Market context
The underlying event is the FIFA World Cup quarter-final between Spain and Belgium at SoFi Stadium in Southern California on Friday, July 13, 2026, where Spain advances if they win or draw. Historical precedents frame the current 35% crowd-implied probability for Belgium winning: Spain is Belgium’s most likely quarter-final opponent at 32.8%, with Belgium’s win rate against them historically only 32.4%[7]. In all World Cup history, Spain and Belgium have met twice, with Spain winning once and drawing once, never losing[12]. Belgium aims to replicate their nation’s famous 1986 quarter-final win against Spain, a match that ended in a penalty shoot-out victory for Belgium[9].
Traders should monitor three key catalysts before the settlement window closes on 2026-07-10: official team news releases, betting line adjustments, and last-minute ticket resale activity on the FIFA Resale Marketplace[1][4]. Spain’s defensive record is a primary factor—they have kept a clean sheet in five consecutive World Cup matches, including their 1-0 Round of 16 victory over Portugal[2][3]. Betting markets currently favour Spain at -155 odds according to BetMGM, suggesting a 61% implied win probability[6]. The market leans heavily on Spain’s defensive stability and recent form, as evidenced by their 35-game unbeaten run[1]. No major campaign-finance disclosures or scheduled debates are expected to influence this sports outcome directly.
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for Spain vs. Belgium - More Markets plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.
FAQ
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- Can prediction markets influence election outcomes?
- Markets reflect expectations rather than create them. Studies show public-facing markets can anchor expectations, but don't influence the underlying outcome. Political markets are information, not advocacy.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Trump Prediction route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
Trade Spain vs. Belgium - More Markets on Trump Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →