Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Trump Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score | 100% |
| GAIS O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Halmstads BK O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| GAIS 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Halmstads BK 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| GAIS (-1.5) | 0% |
| Halmstads BK (-1.5) | 0% |
| GAIS (-2.5) | 0% |
| Halmstads BK (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| GAIS O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| GAIS O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Halmstads BK O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Halmstads BK O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| GAIS 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| GAIS 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Halmstads BK 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Halmstads BK 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| GAIS 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Halmstads BK 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
GAIS meet Halmstads BK in an Allsvenskan fixture with the match scheduled for 26 July, and the market for “more markets” is effectively betting on whether the game produces enough secondary outcomes to be listed and resolved. Forebet’s model has GAIS as the narrow favourite, projecting a 2-1 win in a close contest, which is the kind of baseline that usually keeps ancillary market interest alive rather than producing a one-sided set of derivatives.[1]
In comparable league matches, “more markets” questions tend to track whether a fixture is expected to be competitive, because tighter games are more likely to generate activity around cards, corners, both-teams-to-score, and similar side markets. A 0% crowd-implied chance suggests traders are currently treating this as a low-likelihood listing outcome, so the price is anchored more to the match being routine than to any special scheduling or news-driven catalyst.[1]
The main catalyst to watch is the final pre-match market slate published by the exchange or operator, since these markets typically move only when the matchday menu is confirmed rather than on form alone. If late team news, referee appointments, or other match-specific announcements broaden the available set of proposition markets, that would be the clearest trigger for a repricing; absent that, the current lean remains on a standard, limited offering.[1]
Sources: 1
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for GAIS vs. Halmstads BK - More Markets plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.
FAQ
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- Can prediction markets influence election outcomes?
- Markets reflect expectations rather than create them. Studies show public-facing markets can anchor expectations, but don't influence the underlying outcome. Political markets are information, not advocacy.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Trump Prediction route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
- Why do Polymarket and Kalshi differ on elections?
- Kalshi must follow CFTC compliance — strict definitions, clear resolution sources, US citizens only with KYC. Polymarket operates globally without CFTC oversight — deeper liquidity, but also higher regulatory risk.
Trade GAIS vs. Halmstads BK - More Markets on Trump Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →