Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Trump Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Hammarby IF (-1.5) | 100% |
| Hammarby IF (-2.5) | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| O/U 3.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Hammarby IF O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Hammarby IF O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Hammarby IF O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Hammarby IF 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Hammarby IF 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Hammarby IF 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Degerfors IF (-1.5) | 0% |
| Degerfors IF (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Hammarby IF 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 0% |
| Degerfors IF 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Degerfors IF 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
Hammarby IF secured a 1–0 victory over Degerfors IF in their Allsvenskan match on Sunday, 19 July 2026, at 3 Arena, confirming the outcome that drives this market’s resolution to YES[7]. The result aligns with pre-match bookmaker odds that priced Hammarby as clear favourites at 1.25–1.30, implying a 72–74% probability of a home win[3][5].
Historically, markets with 100% crowd-implied probability on a single outcome in football resolve YES only when the event occurs without dispute or cancellation. Comparable Allsvenskan fixtures where one side dominated pre-match odds—such as Hammarby’s six wins in eight head-to-head encounters against Degerfors—have consistently resolved as predicted when the match proceeded to completion[6]. The absence of late cancellations, weather disruptions, or administrative errors in this fixture mirrors those stable historical cases, reinforcing the certainty of the YES resolution.
Traders should note that the settlement window closed shortly after the match ended, with no pending declarations, debates, or campaign-finance disclosures affecting the outcome. The sole catalyst was the match result itself, which was confirmed by live score data showing a 1–0 Hammarby win[7]. No further announcements or dependencies remain, as the event has fully concluded and the result is official.
Methodology
This page tracks Hammarby IF vs. Degerfors IF - More Markets across four political prediction venues. Live odds come from the Polymarket order book (the deepest political prediction-market book). Kalshi is the CFTC-regulated US alternative, Betfair the established UK sports-exchange with politics markets, Manifold the open play-money variant. For users geo-blocked from Polymarket directly, brokers like Trump Prediction provide a 0%-fee route into the same order book.
Resolution & payout
For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.
FAQ
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Trump Prediction route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
- Why do Polymarket and Kalshi differ on elections?
- Kalshi must follow CFTC compliance — strict definitions, clear resolution sources, US citizens only with KYC. Polymarket operates globally without CFTC oversight — deeper liquidity, but also higher regulatory risk.
Trade Hammarby IF vs. Degerfors IF - More Markets on Trump Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →