Iran agrees to end enrichment of uranium by July 31?

Platform comparison

Market context

Iran’s nuclear programme is still the key real-world driver here: the market resolves **Yes** only if Tehran publicly agrees to stop *all* uranium enrichment by the deadline, which is a much harder threshold than a temporary cap or a partial freeze. The present **72% YES** price is therefore leaning on the idea that ongoing diplomacy could produce a formal pledge, but it also has to discount the long record of Iran using enrichment as a bargaining lever rather than giving it up entirely.[1][4][7]

Historical comparables argue for caution. Under the 2015 JCPOA, Iran accepted limits on enrichment, but those restrictions were temporary and later unraveled as Tehran exceeded stockpile and purity limits after the US withdrawal from the deal era and subsequent disputes.[4][6][7] More recent IAEA reporting still points to a large and advancing enrichment programme, including stockpiles of uranium enriched to 60% purity, which underlines how far any “end all enrichment” pledge would need to go.[6][9] That makes the market’s probability less about whether Iran might accept a narrower freeze, and more about whether negotiators can reach an unusually sweeping concession before July 31.[1][8]

The main catalyst to watch is the diplomatic calendar, not polling or campaign-style signals: traders are effectively waiting on formal statements from Iran, Washington, or intermediaries such as Oman, plus any announced negotiating round that could force a public commitment. Recent background coverage has also noted that the central sticking point in talks remains Iran’s enrichment right itself, with the US reportedly pushing a no-enrichment framework rather than a capped programme, which makes a last-minute breakthrough possible but still heavily dependent on the text of any joint announcement.[7][8]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page tracks Iran agrees to end enrichment of uranium by July 31? across four political prediction venues. Live odds come from the Polymarket order book (the deepest political prediction-market book). Kalshi is the CFTC-regulated US alternative, Betfair the established UK sports-exchange with politics markets, Manifold the open play-money variant. Trump Prediction routes every trade through to Polymarket — at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Trump Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Trump Prediction?

Zero. Trump Prediction routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.