Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Trump Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
27% | 73% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
27% | 73% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| James Wood | 27% |
| Josh Jung | 23% |
| Kevin McGonigle | 18% |
| Willy Adames | 10% |
| Matt Olson | 10% |
| Bobby Witt Jr. | 8% |
| Freddie Freeman | 7% |
| Ernie Clement | 5% |
| Ezequiel Tovar | 4% |
| Nico Hoerner | 3% |
| Mauricio Dubón | 3% |
| Taylor Ward | 2% |
| Bo Bichette | 2% |
| Bryan Reynolds | 2% |
| Francisco Lindor | 2% |
| Vladimir Guerrero Jr. | 2% |
| Gavin Sheets | 1% |
| Casey Schmitt | 1% |
| Pete Alonso | 1% |
| Jarren Duran | 1% |
| Maikel Garcia | 1% |
| Pete Crow-Armstrong | 1% |
| Salvador Perez | 1% |
| Bryce Harper | 1% |
| Ian Happ | 1% |
| Juan Soto | 1% |
| George Springer | 1% |
| Corbin Carroll | 1% |
| Riley Greene | 1% |
| Colt Keith | 0% |
| Christian Walker | 0% |
| Adley Rutschman | 0% |
| Rhys Hoskins | 0% |
| Gabriel Moreno | 0% |
| Brent Rooker | 0% |
| CJ Abrams | 0% |
| Shohei Ohtani | 0% |
| Aaron Judge | 0% |
| Andy Pages | 0% |
| Nick Kurtz | 0% |
| Yordan Alvarez | 0% |
| Player B | 0% |
| Player C | 0% |
| Player D | 0% |
| Player E | 0% |
| Player F | 0% |
| Player G | 0% |
| Player H | 0% |
| Player I | 0% |
| Player J | 0% |
| Player K | 0% |
| Player L | 0% |
| Player M | 0% |
| Player N | 0% |
| Player O | 0% |
| Player P | 0% |
| Player Q | 0% |
| Player R | 0% |
| Player S | 0% |
| Player T | 0% |
| Player U | 0% |
| Player V | 0% |
| Player W | 0% |
| Player X | 0% |
| Player Y | 0% |
| Player Z | 0% |
| Player AA | 0% |
| Player AB | 0% |
| Player AC | 0% |
| Player AD | 0% |
| Player AE | 0% |
| Player AF | 0% |
| Player AG | 0% |
| Player AH | 0% |
| Player AI | 0% |
| Player AJ | 0% |
| Player AK | 0% |
| Player AL | 0% |
| Player AM | 0% |
| Player AN | 0% |
| Player AO | 0% |
| Player AP | 0% |
| Player AQ | 0% |
| Player AR | 0% |
| Player AS | 0% |
| Player AT | 0% |
| Player AU | 0% |
| Player AV | 0% |
| Player AW | 0% |
| Player AX | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
Market context
The 2026 MLB regular season will determine which player accumulates the most doubles across all 162 games. The doubles leader has historically been a reliable indicator of consistent offensive production, typically correlating with players who maintain high contact rates and occupy middle-of-the-order positions. Over the past decade, the annual doubles leader has ranged from 47 to 54 doubles, with the title most often claimed by established hitters aged 26–34 who benefit from full seasons without significant injury.
The 2% implied probability reflects the market's assessment that no single player has emerged as a consensus favourite at this stage. With the 2026 season still months away, roster compositions remain fluid; trades, free-agent signings, and injury recoveries will substantially reshape which players accumulate plate appearances in doubles-friendly situations. Recent MLB off-season activity shows continued volatility in player movement, with several veteran hitters changing teams or adjusting their roles within new organisations.
Traders should monitor spring training performance reports and early-season statistics once play begins in March 2026, as the first month typically establishes baseline trends for doubles accumulation. Injuries to prominent hitters—particularly those in power-hitting roles—will shift probability distributions significantly. The settlement window closes on 11 October 2026, coinciding with the end of the regular season, leaving no opportunity for late-season adjustments or clarifications once official MLB records are finalised.
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for MLB: Doubles Leader plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
Political markets typically settle on official candidate or agency confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window opens, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD via CFTC clearinghouse, with clearly defined resolution sources (e.g. AP race calls for elections). Betfair settles after the official outcome is registered with the league or agency. Manifold is play-money.
FAQ
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
- Are political prediction markets legal in my country?
- It varies. They sit in legal gray areas in most jurisdictions. Polymarket is geo-blocked from US/UK/EU; some broker frontends have a different geo footprint. Trade only with capital you can afford to lose, and only if you understand the legal status in your jurisdiction.
- Which political events have the biggest volume?
- US Presidential election, party nominations (DNC/RNC), Senate majorities, individual state outcomes (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin), and major European elections. Peak markets reach $50-500M per event.
Trade MLB: Doubles Leader on Trump Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →